A. Build a Sustainable Combined Search Portal Service:
Building on several years of digital library research, we will create
an easily manageable and reusable software suite for the creation and
maintenance of humanities-oriented search portals that implements all
of the experimental techniques that we have developed to date in the
MetaCombine project for harvesting, automatically classifying, and metasearching
information resources combined from multiple sources (Web, OAI, and
other sources). We will use this software to implement a scholarly subject
portal focused on Southern cultures and history that will index and
organize sources reviewed and selected by an advisory panel of scholars.
We tentatively intend to call the service SouthComb, a name meant to
be evocative in several senses: “Comb” is a root word simultaneously
associated with a tool for organizing unruly tangles of hair, an ordered
cache of honey created by industrious bees, and an agricultural vehicle
that harvests masses of ripe grain. By combining the roots “South”
and “Comb” we hope to capture a variety of connotations
for such an information harvesting and organization system.
B. Improve Networked Access to Humanities Collections in the
South:
There is a great need to mobilize collaborative efforts to improve networked
access to humanities research collections at cultural repositories.
Our previous work has led us to several effective approaches to addressing
this need that we will deploy. Assisting smaller institutions in deploying
mechanisms like the OAI-PMH leads to greatly improved exposure of “hidden”
collections through metadata harvesting services. Subject portals, especially
those with metasearch capabilities, have been shown to have great utility
for both scholarship and teaching. New models for digital peer-reviewed
publications such as Southern Spaces have provided scholars with ways
of producing research that uses such collections and makes them more
accessible. We will pursue all of these approaches in the course of
this project, and will make a special effort to establish long term
mechanisms for engaging in such collaborative efforts.
First, we will work with the faculty of several of the largest Southern
studies programs in the country, including the programs based at the
university systems of Mississippi, South Carolina, Virginia, North Carolina,
Kentucky, Georgia, and Alabama. By working with an expanded group of
Southern studies programs and archives to deploy and refine the technologies
we have developed, we intend to make the SouthComb service an integral
part of how materials are used by scholars investigating Southern cultures
and histories, and how archives provide access to such materials. We
will specifically engage in collaborative efforts with these academic
programs to tailor sub-portals of the SouthComb service to their research
needs, conducting an analysis of their research and teaching needs and
then associated usability studies to make sure the service is accomplishing
its aims. Several different kinds of contextualization services will
be incorporated in this system for purposes of research and pedagogy,
potentially including some GIS and recommender capabilities.
Second, in the course of these interactions we will further widen the
involvement of scholars in producing new digital publications in Southern
Spaces contextualizing and analyzing collections held in cultural repositories
throughout the region. We have developed methods for engaging scholars
in such digital productions in the course of cultivating the Southern
Spaces internet journal and forum. This approach directly connects scholars
with the process of improving access to collections.
Finally, we will work with a number of smaller, hidden "treasure-trove"
archives in these states to improve access to their holdings. This
would be done by advancing our model for regional collaboration developed
in the IMLS-funded Music
of Social Change project
for exposing digitized collections of materials related to various
aspects of Southern cultures and histories, including the civil rights
movement,
Southern folk life, and early Black pamphlets. We will advise institutions
in the use of OAI-PMH tools such as the Metadata
Migrator which we recently developed as part of the same
IMLS project. We will also work with the partner institutions of the MetaArchive
Cooperative preservation network led by Emory University,
which has been developed as part of the National Digital Information
and Infrastructure Preservation Program (NDIIPP) of the Library of
Congress.
This collaborative effort will seek to provide better access to the
public materials (as opposed to embargoed or private materials) preserved
in the MetaArchive network.
Our general goal in all of these interactions would be to seek ways
of better exposing high-quality collections for scholarly communication
purposes. We are particularly interested in analyzing such interactions
with a mind to long term sustainability of such efforts. This relates
to our third and final project goal of sustainability for our program.
C. Explore Sustainable Models for the Advancement of Scholarly
Cyberinfrastructure
A third goal of this project is to examine models for creating sustainable
long-term services for scholars. This will be accomplished through consultation
with a variety of experts to explore options for such service programs
at Emory University. A careful market analysis will be conducted by
consultants in the first year of the project for the services of this
sustainable entity. A compelling user interface will be developed, making
use of web design consultants. Operational models for the service will
be evaluated in consultation with business service consultants. Finally,
several meetings will be conducted with experts to explore models for
sustainability of digital library services.